|
This article is a comparative analysis of three Chinese gardens in Australia, the Garden of Friendship at Darling Harbour, Sydney, the Yiyuan (Garden of Joy) in Bendigo, Victoria, and the Tianjin Garden at Parliament Station, Melbourne, in relation to the different, traditional Chinese garden styles that they reproduce or from which they derive: the scholar garden, the Imperial garden and the miniature or reduced-scale garden. Their success as modern-day instances of these styles is judged in terms of the extent to which they can be seen as authentic diasporic instances of these styles, creatively adapting the conventions of the styles to the requirements of specific sites and circumstances, rather than as educational theme-park simulacra of gardens in China itself, and the civilisation these embody. With the Garden of Friendship in particular the essay stresses the role of Australian expertise and materials in achieving such creative adaptation. In pursuing its comparisons the article addresses the distinction between gardens and theme-parks, re-asserting the validity of the distinction against its questioning in recent academic writing.
|